For an Immediate, Total and Unconditional Disarmament of all Nuclear Weapons

By Anton Heinzl Published 16 July, 2014

Cuba Missile Crisis

On 16 July, 1944, almost 69 years ago, and as part of the Trinity Project, the first atomic bomb was ignited in the USA. The result of this test was satisfactory. Just four weeks later, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were completely annihilated by atomic bombs.

The pressure wave of "Little Boy" destroyed all the buildings in Hiroshima within a radius of two kilometers. The heat of the fireball burned people into dust. Tens of thousands still suffer from the effects of radiation.

The explosive power of the Hiroshima bomb is low when compared to the explosive force of the other bombs that were built in the years and decades that followed. Calculations assume that it would take about 50 atomic bombs similar to the one used in Hiroshima to eradicate humanity and all plants and animals through a nuclear winter. Worldwide, there are at least 17,000 nuclear warheads ready for use.

One does not need to assume the worst scenario of a nuclear war in order to realize that every single nuclear weapon is a number too much and would constitute a real danger. The humanitarian impact from a single explosion would be disastrous; hundreds of thousands would be affected.

The risk that a nuclear warhead might fall into the wrong hands does not pose the only danger. Technical systems can fail too. An accident might occur, or monitoring systems can malfunction, and give an erroneous warning of a first strike by an opponent, similar to the one that occured in 1983 in the USSR. At that time, the responsible Russian officer Stanislav Petrov has decided not to rely on the computer warnings. Had his decision been different, we wouldn't be alive today.

I could go on to list many other examples where humanity has narrowly escaped a nuclear annihilation during the last 69 years, but I think this is not necessary. Here I would like to quote Albert Einstein: "Man invented the atom bomb, but no mouse would ever construct a mousetrap."

With respect to nuclear weapons, there is security policy wise only one right answer: An immediate, total and unconditional disarmament. Austria, a country that is entitled to make use of nuclear power for civilian purposes, has always held and actively advocated this position internationally.

We are not alone with this important message. Norway and Mexico strongly endeavor to ensure that the terms of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1970 are finally accepted and implemented by all states.

The commitment of Austria in cooperation with Norway and Mexico, to provide a new impetus in the disarmament debate is to be clearly welcomed.

The announced conference for December on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons is an important step on the road to a nuclear-free world.

Anton Heinzl

About the Author
Anton Heinzl is an Austrian politician and Parliamentarian.
This article is based on a speech he gave in the Austrian parliament on the 10 July, 2014. This article was translated from German by Dr. M M. Elghusein.

Arikel picture: 800 women from the Women Strike for Peace demonstrate in New York on 23rd October for a peaceful settlement of the crisis.

Coming Soon on iPad

Video Choice

of the Week

Lincoln’s Code: The Puzzling History of the Laws of War. John Fabian Witt, Allen H. Duffy Class of 1960 Professor of Law, Inaugural Lecture.

Tip: Suggest a video!

Ask Jeeves UK